Brown contra el Consejo Escolar — la conclusión
Chief Justice Earl Warren, for a unanimous Court · 1954
Aprende cómo está construido y escribe el tuyo: en cada frase y párrafo estudias el ejemplo, ves su estructura y escribes el tuyo con ella, con corrección por IA.
Warren nombra el daño que la separación causa a los niños, afirma que la ciencia actual respalda esa constatación, rechaza el lenguaje contrario del caso antiguo y enuncia el fallo. El extracto es el pasaje final, sin la cita en bloque que introduce.
Lo que practicarás
- 01Enunciar el daño antes que la regla
- 02Revocar una autoridad diciendo exactamente qué se rechaza
- 03Dejar sola la frase que decide
Texto original preparado
172 palabras · 8 frasesSuch considerations apply with added force to children in grade and high schools. To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Whatever may have been the extent of psychological knowledge at the time of Plessy v. Ferguson, this finding is amply supported by modern authority. Any language in Plessy v. Ferguson contrary to this finding is rejected.
We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This disposition makes unnecessary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Fuente y derechos
Opinions of United States courts carry no copyright — they are edicts of government and stand in the public domain. Scripta reproduces the wording as published and normalizes only typography.