ブラウン対教育委員会 — 結びの箇所
Chief Justice Earl Warren, for a unanimous Court · 1954
良い文章の構造を身につけ、自分の話で書きます。文と段落ごとに例文を覚え、構造を確かめ、同じ構造で自分の文章を書くと AI が採点します。
ウォーレンが分離が子どもに与える害を挙げ、今日の学問がその認定を裏づけると述べ、旧判例の反する文言を排したうえで、判示を示す結びの箇所です。間に引かれる引用段落は省いています。
この文章で練習すること
- 01規則を述べる前にまず害を述べる
- 02何を排するかを正確に示して先例を覆す
- 03決め手となる一文は単独で立たせる
準備済みの英文
172 語 · 8 文Such considerations apply with added force to children in grade and high schools. To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Whatever may have been the extent of psychological knowledge at the time of Plessy v. Ferguson, this finding is amply supported by modern authority. Any language in Plessy v. Ferguson contrary to this finding is rejected.
We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This disposition makes unnecessary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
出典と権利
Opinions of United States courts carry no copyright — they are edicts of government and stand in the public domain. Scripta reproduces the wording as published and normalizes only typography.