브라운 대 교육위원회 — 맺는 대목
Chief Justice Earl Warren, for a unanimous Court · 1954
좋은 글의 구조를 익혀 내 이야기로 써요. 문장과 문단마다 예시를 익히고, 구조를 보고, 같은 구조로 내 글을 쓰면 AI가 채점해요.
워런이 분리가 아이들에게 입히는 피해를 짚고, 오늘의 학문이 그 판단을 뒷받침한다고 말하고, 옛 판결의 어긋나는 표현을 배척한 뒤, 판시를 내놓는 맺는 대목이에요. 사이에 인용된 판결문 인용 단락은 뺐어요.
이 글에서 학습할 것
- 01규칙을 말하기 전에 피해부터 말하기
- 02무엇을 배척하는지 정확히 짚어 선례를 뒤집기
- 03판가름하는 문장은 홀로 세우기
준비된 영어 원문
172 단어 · 8 문장Such considerations apply with added force to children in grade and high schools. To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Whatever may have been the extent of psychological knowledge at the time of Plessy v. Ferguson, this finding is amply supported by modern authority. Any language in Plessy v. Ferguson contrary to this finding is rejected.
We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This disposition makes unnecessary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
출처와 저작권
Opinions of United States courts carry no copyright — they are edicts of government and stand in the public domain. Scripta reproduces the wording as published and normalizes only typography.